One news story that attracted our attention in 2015 was the one in which a bank was penalised for age discrimination after withdrawing a mortgage approval for a married couple in their 40s, on the grounds that the husband would be over 65 when the deal ended.
The Financial Ombudsman Service ruled in the couple’s favour and ordered the bank to pay them £500 in compensation, saying that the bank had relied on “untested assumptions, stereotypes or generalisations in respect of age”.
Should we be given the chance to keep up mortgage payments past the age of 65?
It’s arguable that being 65 today - in terms of health, lifestyle, fitness and expectations – is not the same as being 65 twenty, certainly forty years ago. And 65 being the default retirement age has been phased out, and people can work as long as they choose to – employers are no longer allowed to discriminate against workers choosing to work beyond 65. Continue reading